July 08, 2008
Memo From Mexico,
By
Allan Wall
More Latin Loudmouths—Mercosur Hypocritically Hectors EU On Immigration.
Does this sound familiar? A declaration rejecting
"every effort to
criminalise irregular migration and the adoption of
restrictive immigration policies, in particular against
the most vulnerable sectors of society,
women and
children."
Furthermore, the declaration notes "the necessity
to fight against racism, discrimination, xenophobia and
other forms of intolerance".
Typical rhetoric from
Mexican politicians attacking U.S. immigration policy?
This time, it’s not.
In fact, the rhetoric doesn’t even come from
Mexicans, but from
other Latin Americans. And it’s not even directed
against the United States, but against
Europeans.
What’s going on here?
The declaration was concocted at the recent conclave
of
Mercosur, the South American trade bloc. (Mercosur
is a Spanish acronym for "Common Market of the
South". In
Portuguese it’s Mercosul.)
The Mercosur leaders are incensed at the
European Union’s recently-approved rules for dealing
with
illegal immigration. The new rules would enable EU
countries to detain illegal aliens up to 18 months if
deemed necessary, and ban them for re-entry for 5 years.
[EU
Approves Illegal Migrants Plan, BBC News, June
18th, 2008]
So at the Mercosur meeting, held in
Tucuman, Argentina, the assembled heads of states
and ministers let the EU have it.
Neo-communist Venezuelan dictator
Hugo Chavez declared that the European Union had
"legalized barbarism" (he should talk). Europe’s new
policies are, according to Ecuadorian president Rafael
Correa, "shameful". Brazilian president Lula da
Silva said they were "outrageous and ignominious".
Argentine president Cristina Kirchner said the new law
was inadmissible. And Bolivian president
Evo Morales complained that the
Europeans don’t combat racism.
Blah, blah—just like
Mexicans griping about U.S. immigration policy.
The momentous declaration mentioned at the beginning
of this article was signed by leaders or ministers from
Mercosur members Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and
Uruguay, by Venezuela (in process of joining) and
associate members Chile, Bolivia, Ecuador, Colombia, and
Peru.
Here’s a photo of the South American leaders feeling
very good about themselves. [Mercosur
condemns EU Migrant Law, BBC News, July 2,
2008]
So why is Mercosur zinging the European Union over
its immigration policy?
For one thing, it’s good PR for the folks in their
home countries, based on a declaration that costs them
essentially nothing.
The fact is, there are now hundreds of thousands of
South Americans living and working in Europe, and—gasp—a
lot of them are illegal aliens. So it’s similar to the
Mexico/U.S. relationship, except that we’re talking
about crossing the
Atlantic Ocean rather than the
Rio Grande. Which means the illegals either must be
very good swimmers or they are flying or sailing across
the pond and becoming illegal aliens.
Now personally, I’m no fan of the
European Union. It’s an elitist,
supranational behemoth determined to suppress
traditional European culture and
erase the historic
nation-states of Europe, with
definite totalitarian tendencies.
Yet, it’s absolutely outrageous for the nations of
Mercosur to bash the EU on the immigration issue. Europe
has a big problem with illegal immigration. And even
their
legal immigration is importing millions of
foreigners who
aren’t assimilating, including
Muslims who wish to
conquer Europe.
It’s truly astonishing today to see
the high immigration rates in so many European
countries. It has the potential of rapidly altering the
demographics of various countries.
Here are the immigrants as proportion of total
population figures from various European countries: the
Netherlands (10%),
France (10%),
Spain (11%),
Germany (12%),
Sweden (12%),
Austria (15%),
Switzerland (23%), and tiny
Luxembourg with 37% of a total population of half a
million.
In contrast,
Mercosur nations don’t currently have high proportions
of immigrants.
Here are the immigrant proportion of the populations
of the Mercosur nations: Argentina (4%), Venezuela (4%),
Paraguay (2.7%), Uruguay (2.43%), Chile (1.4%),Bolivia
(1.27%), Ecuador (0.86%), Brazil (0.34%), Colombia
(0.27%), and Peru with a whopping 0.15%.
Now it’s certainly true that all these Latin American
might have very good reasons to want a low immigration
rate. And I certainly respect the sovereign right of
each and every one of them to manage their own
immigration policy.
But don’t European countries have the same right?
Some of the South American countries, principally
Argentina and Brazil, have had some high immigration
rates in the past. But that era has ended—basically
because these countries messed up their economies.
If Mercosur continues to expand and take in all the
associate members, it should be interesting to see just
how integrated the bloc becomes. Will Mercosur allow
open borders among all ten members? These countries
display great economic and social diversity.
And what about the
ethnic balance in each of the countries?
Latin Americans
say they don’t care about race, but a look at the
region tells us otherwise. In all these countries, the
higher you go on the socioeconomic ladder, the
whiter the people are.
Colombia, Venezuela, Ecuador, Peru
and Paraguay have
mestizo majorities. Bolivia has an Indian
majority. Brazil is about
half white and 43% mixed (Indian, White and Black).
However, when you get down to the Southern Cone, the
countries of Argentina, Chile and Uruguay are
predominantly white. Uruguay, a country you hardly hear
about in the news, is 95% white!
Indeed, Argentina was, after the U.S., the second
biggest recipient of immigrants in the Western
Hemisphere. And
Argentina has
traditionally preferred white immigrants. That
preference was and still is part of its
constitution.
Section 25 specifically stipulates that "The
Federal Government shall foster European immigration…"
Why didn’t anybody bring that up at the Mercosur
meeting?
American citizen Allan Wall (
email
him) resides in Mexico, with a
legal permit issued him by the Mexican government. Allan
recently returned from a tour of duty in Iraq with the
Texas Army National Guard. His VDARE.COM articles are
archived
here; his FRONTPAGEMAG.COM
articles are archived
here his "Dispatches from
Iraq" are archived
here his website is
here.