Memo From Mexico, By Allan WallWhy The Majority Of Mexican Immigrants Are Not Going To Vote For The GOPAllan
Wall is an American living in Mexico, where he
doesn’t have a vote. Presently employed as an
English instructor and administrator, Wall has legal
permission from the Mexican government to live and
work in Mexico under the rubric of an FM-2 migration
document (No. 312448) for which he had to pay
$1,816.00 pesos for renewal this past year. George W. Bush and the
Republican leadership have staked the future of the
party on the slender hope of winning the Hispanic
vote. Proven vote-getters such as Official
English and immigration
reform have been cast aside in the mad rush to
please Hispanics (or the activists
who purport to speak for them) at all costs. Even
Bush’s spectacular failure
to win the Hispanic vote in the Y2K election
has not cooled their ardor for the "Hispanic
Strategy”. Like Samuel Johnson's description
of a second marriage —"The triumph of hope
over experience" — the GOP soldiers on.
If they could only be a little more
sensitive, use a little more Spanish, if they could
just pander a little bit more, then surely, surely,
the much-coveted Hispanic vote would be theirs. I believe they are wrong. It is
highly unlikely that in this generation, the
Republicans will win the majority of the Hispanic
vote. And it's not because the Republicans are
racist, anti-immigrant, or xenophobic — I see no
evidence that they are. But due to a number of
overriding social factors, the majority of today's
Mexican immigrants are unlikely to vote for the
Republican party — they are simply not attracted
to it. And most of these factors are applicable to
Hispanic immigrants in general (with the exception
of the Cubans). In short, the Republican leadership
is pulling out all the stops to win voters who are
probably unwinnable. 1] Family Connections Influence Mexican
Immigrants To Vote For The Democrats
U.S. immigration is based on
"family reunification", which in other
walks of life would be known as
"nepotism". The majority of legal
immigrants are admitted simply on the basis of their
already having a relative in the U.S. And since the
majority of Mexican-Americans vote
for the Democrats — what political party do
you think their immigrant relatives will vote for?
Bear in mind that the majority of voters, of
whatever background, do not choose their political
party as a result of careful study and reflection —
most people vote for the same party that their
family does! So family connections influence new
immigrants to vote for the Democrats. 2] The Republican Party Already Has A Bad
Reputation In Some Circles In Mexico
Some Mexicans are already
prejudiced against the Republican Party. Here are
some opinions of the Republican Party which I have
heard here in Mexico: "The party of the
rich." "Republicans are bad to
Mexicans." "The Republicans don't
like us." "The Mexicans want Al
Gore." (Spoken in November of 2000). I've even heard a former Texas
illegal alien badmouthing George W. Bush! Rest assured that I attempted
to correct such false ideas of the Republican Party.
But whether I convinced my listeners or not, there
are others with the same ideas. I don't mean to
suggest that every Mexican has a bad opinion of the
Republican Party, but there is definitely a sector
of the population that is already prejudiced against
the GOP. Bill Clinton became popular among many
Mexicans, and was widely acclaimed for bailing out
Mexico after the peso crash, while the Republicans
were blamed for being against it. By the way, the
Monica Lewinsky scandal didn't seem to hurt
Clinton's popularity in Mexico, though later John
Ashcroft was vilified
as "conservative" - a pejorative
term in the Mexican media. 3] Mexican Immigrants Don't Care About Tax Cuts
The Republican Party has been
obsessed with tax cuts since the heady days of
Ronald Reagan. Now tax cuts are fine and dandy (and
would be even finer if accompanied by spending
cuts!), but you can't build an entire party platform
on them (as Bob Dole unsuccessfully tried to do in
'96). And you surely can't use them to entice many
lower-income people into voting for the Republican
Party — for the simple reason that they don't pay
much in taxes. (The half of the population with the
lowest income pays a whopping 4% of the tax
revenue.) And since Mexican immigrants are among the
half of the population that makes less money, they
don't care about tax cuts either! (Capital gains tax
cuts? — give me a break!). 4] Most Immigrants Aren't Attracted To Limited
Government Philosophies
The way you hear some
libertarians defend open borders, you'd think that
hordes of immigrants are clutching copies
of von Mises in their hands as they cross the
border! What they don't seem to understand is that
most immigrants, from most countries of the world,
do not care a fig for philosophies of limited
government. That's because the philosophy of limited
government is not very strong in most of the world.
(Its natural home would seem to be the Anglo-Saxon
culture — but it's even under heavy attack
there.) Limited government philosophy
is not even very strong in the continental European
democracies being sucked into the EU superstate now
under construction. Here in Mexico, the political
and academic world is infused with paternalism, big-statism,
even Marxism (there's a street in my city named
after Che Guevara). No political party in Mexico
advocates limited government. (Vicente
Fox actually promised a government that would
both produce wealth and distribute it!) Of course, the concept of
"good government" and "bad
government" exists. There is even a contrast
between "centralism" and
"federalism." But the Mexican concept of
federalism is to demand that the federal government
distribute more money to the states than the
centralists do. Few Mexicans see the concept of
limited government as a desirable one. And that is
even more true among the lower-income
classes from which immigrants come. So don't
expect Mexican immigrants to rush to the Republican
Party because it leans (a little) more toward
limited government than the Democrats. 5] Despite What You've Heard, Mexican Immigrants
Are Not Attracted By Social Conservative Politics
We've heard this one again and
again — Mexicans (and Hispanics in general) are
naturally conservative, strong Catholics, are
family-oriented, etc., so they will eventually be
Republicans. Most Americans are pretty
ignorant about contemporary Mexico; their
perspectives on the country are about 50 years out
of date. And this allows them to fall for such
misleading stereotypes. In the first place, the
Catholic Church is much weaker in Mexico than people
think. The majority of Mexicans don't attend Mass
and the church has failed to inculcate its moral
values among much of the younger generations. The
Catholic Church can't even recruit enough priests
from the Mexican population and so has to import
priests from other countries. In short, the Catholic
Church in Mexico (and Latin America in general) is
in decline. Many people ignore the fact
that Mexico is an integral part of the Western
World. As such, it has been affected by the same
philosophical and social trends as the rest of the
West. Name any social problem in the U.S., and you
can also find it on the increase here in Mexico.
Family breakdown? It's going on here (and is
exacerbated by immigration, by the way). Drug
abuse— it's here too. Pre-marital sex is on
the increase, and extra-marital sex has been
accepted for years, as long as it was practiced by a
married man and an unmarried mistress. Homosexuality
is becoming more accepted, and a gay rights movement
is gaining strength. About 20% of Mexican mothers
are single mothers. There has even been a school
shooting in Mexico—I guess the kid was a bad shot,
because nobody died. And abortion? There are more
legal restrictions on abortion in Mexico than in the
U.S., but in Mexico laws against abortion are not
enforced! According to one calculation, there are
more abortions performed in Mexico, per capita, than
in the U.S.! And in the U.S.A. Hispanic women have more
abortions than
non-Hispanic women! Let me hasten to add that there
are many good, moral Mexican people, with good
family values — just as there are in the U.S.A.
But the same social problems exist —to a greater
or lesser degree — in both the U.S. and Mexico.
And upon arrival to the U.S., Mexican immigrants
show no interest in the social conservative wing of
the Republican party and aren't inclined to vote for
it. The acid test — they don't
vote for the Republican Party! Why do some
people expect them to in the near future? 6] Mexican Immigrants Are Being Recruited Into
The Welfare State
There are those who say that
the welfare state can be eliminated without reducing
immigration. My question to such well-meaning people
is — HOW? The present immigration system is
inextricably linked to the welfare state. In fact,
immigration is a massive recruitment program for the
welfare state. You might even say today's immigrants
are specially chosen to be welfare recipients. And
receive welfare they
do— at a higher rate than native-born
Americans. That includes Mexican immigrants and Hispanic
immigrants in
general. Now which of the two major political
parties is apt to push for more welfare benefits?
The Democratic Party! So why do Republicans expect
them to vote for the GOP? It simply boggles the
imagination. 7] Pandering Only Makes Things Worse
Pete Wilson, possibly the most
courageous Republican politician of the 1990's, has
been held up as a bad example and treated as a
pariah. Don't be like Pete Wilson, Republicans are
told. Wilson is accused of "losing" the
Hispanic vote (but how can you lose what you didn't
have?). In 1994, while running for re-election for
governor of California, Wilson gave full support to
Proposition 187 (which meant to cut off benefits to
illegal aliens). Wilson won the election — and so
did Proposition 187 (which was later struck down at
the behest of the president of Mexico— but that's another
story). Four years later,
politically-correct Republican candidate Dan Lungren,
pandering to Latinos, repudiated Prop. 187 and
refused to criticize (or even question) the mass
immigration policy which was (and is) causing so
many problems for the state. Not only did Lungren
fail to speak up, he also lost the election — and
even received a lower proportion of the Hispanic
vote than Wilson had in 1994! It seems Hispanics
themselves have little respect for panderers like
Lungren and George W. Bush, who received a lower
percentage of the Hispanic vote than non-panderer
Ronald Reagan did. The Republican Party faces
demographic disaster if it doesn't change course
soon. The Y2K election should have removed all
doubt. Dubya tried so hard to please everybody. The
result? Bush lost the Hispanic vote, lost the black
vote, lost the Asian vote, barely won the white vote, lost the popular vote, and barely won
the Supreme Court vote. By 2008, if present trends
continue, it will be mathematically
impossible for the Republican presidential
candidate to win the presidential election. What Should The Republicans Do?
The Republican Party needs to
push through real immigration reform. Immigration
reduction is good for the country anyway — the
present system is leading us to social, educational,
environmental and political disaster. Immigration
should be drastically reduced and chain migration
ended. Future immigrants should be chosen on their
merits as individuals — and they should have to
pass an English test as a requirement for entry. All
federal funding for bilingual education should be
cut off, English declared the official language, and
practically all government business conducted in
English. Such policies are quite likely
to increase the Republicans' white support
and possibly even its black support
(Pete Wilson received about 20% of the black vote,
stratospheric for a Republican). Republicans should
continue to appeal for the votes of citizens of
Mexican ancestry— but by appealing to them as
Americans, and not as Mexican-Americans! Such a
strategy could still win the votes of those
Americans of Mexican ancestry who really agree with
Republican principles, and that group of voters
could actually increase as time goes by, since
established Hispanics are more apt to support
immigration reduction. The present strategy of mass
immigration, multiculturalism and pandering are
leading the party to oblivion and the country to
disaster. In contrast, a policy of immigration
reform, national unity and an appeal to American
interests both give the party a future and are good
for the nation as a whole. What the Republican Party needs, above all, is real leadership that will take the bull by the horns and do what needs to be done. Allan Wall is an American citizen who has lived and worked in Mexico since 1991. Presently employed as an English instructor, Allan has legal permission from the Mexican government to live and work in Mexico under the rubric of an FM-2 migration document. His VDARE.COM articles are archived here; his Frontpage.com articles are archived here. Allan Wall welcomes questions or comments (pro or con) at allan39@prodigy.net.mx. May 29, 2001 |
The articles on VDARE.com are brought to you by the VDARE Foundation. We are supported by generous donations from our readers. Contributions are tax deductible and appreciated. Contribute...
[Home] [Why VDARE.com / The White Doe?] [FAQ] [Blog] [e-Bulletins] [Contact Us] [VDARE.com People Pages] [Links] [Search] [Blog Search] [Archive] [Letters] [The VDARE Foundation] [Make A Tax-Deductible Contribution]
Copyright © 1999 - 2008 VDARE.com