April 18, 2008
NOTE: PLEASE say if you DON'T want your name and/or
email address published when sending VDARE email.
04/17/08
- A California Lawyer Says Political Pundits “Fail To
Grasp The Obvious” About Barack Obama
A Roman Catholic Reader In Illinois Asks Why VDARE.COM Posted Peter Gadiel’s “Rant”; Gadiel Replies
From:
Dennis Nicholl (e-mail
him)
Re:
An Open Letter To Pope Benedict XVI On the Occasion Of
His U. S. Visit
What were you thinking when you posted Gadiel’s
attack?
Of course, VDARE.COM hedged by pointing out in its
preface to Gadiel’s column that the site is not
anti-Catholic.
Interesting that Gadiel singles out the Pope Benedict
for the ongoing immigration fiasco. He doesn’t mention
that we have had 43 years of Protestant presidents since
the
Immigration Act of 1965.
I have news for Gadiel. The Pope has no clout in
America. If he did would there
abortion,
homosexual marriages,
secularization of Christmas and Catholic bashing in
Hollywood?
What would Gadiel have the Pope do about immigration?
Imagine the ridicule he would face if he appeared
anti-immigration.
VDARE.COM should not allow a hack like Gadiel to take
gratuitous cheap shots at the Pope by calling him "Benny",
telling him to
drink responsibly (what does that mean?) and, of
course, mentioning pedophile priests while supposedly
discussing immigration?
Gadiel has it out for the Pope yet he mentions
Robert Mapplethorpe without comment.
And when, may I ask, was the last time VDARE.COM
ridiculed Judaism?
Your site is measured by the quality of the material
you post. The less of Gadiel, the better off VDARE.COM
will be.
Peter Gadiel
replies:
My archive has numerous columns criticizing
President Bush repeatedly—and quite sarcastically—for
his refusal to enforce immigration law.
I addressed my mocking
missive to the Pope because he is in the U.S. now
lobbying Bush. As a participant in the rough and tumble
of politics, the Pope and his followers must accept that
he will be subject to criticism.
As to Mapplethorpe,
Nicholl entirely missed the thrust of my comment.
Mapplethorpe's
celebration of perversion is to me offensive. I
didn't think it was necessary to spell that out.
Although I am not a
Catholic, I am far from anti-Catholic. I admire many
Catholics. However, when I see hypocrisy, even on the
part of the Pope, I will not keep silent.
James Fulford writes:
Mr. Nicholl writes "When, may I ask, was the last
time VDARE.COM ridiculed Judaism?" It is not our
policy to ridicule anyone's sincerely held religious
beliefs. We leave that up to professional comedians
like, for example,
Sarah Silverman.
Since peoples'
religious belief affects their attitude towards
public policy, many of our writers do discuss Jews
and Judaism, to the point where there have been several
complaints about it (The SPLC, for example,
seems to be trying to get
Professor Kevin MacDonald fired from his
job.)
.Of course, we've also
been critical of
Lutherans,
Hindus,
Methodists, and the
Yezidis of Iraq, who worship
the Peacock Angel. When we've got through with them,
we start on what President Bush thinks of as the
Religion of Peace. We really are
non-denominationally offensive, and Mr. Nicholl's
implication of a surrender to political correctness is
as unfair as the parallel imputations of anti-Semitism
we receive from the SPLC.