July 16, 2008
Mexican Asylum Applicants: Early Sign Of A Failed State?
By
Rep. Tom Tancredo
Mexican law enforcement
officials are walking
into U.S. ports of entry in increasing numbers to
seek political asylum, and the flow may soon become a
flood as Mexico's battle with the
drug cartels intensifies. Our first instinct is to
welcome them, but there is more at stake than
humanitarian sentiments.
The problem is that if
our immigration laws are stretched to grant asylum to
law enforcement personnel on the grounds that their own
government cannot protect them, any Mexican threatened
by these
violent criminal gangs can claim the same right of
asylum.
U.S. immigration law
does not easily accommodate these law enforcement cases
because they are fleeing threats from organized
crime—the Mexican drug cartels—not political persecution
by
their government. If our laws are stretched to
accept thousands of refugees from drug cartel violence,
it will only exacerbate Mexico's problems.
We can sympathize with
the Mexican police chief or prosecutor who lands on a
cartel hit list because he will not play ball with them.
The
Mexican federal government seemingly cannot protect
him and his family, so he flees to El Paso or Nogales
and seeks asylum. The number of such asylum applications
more than doubled in the first six months of 2008
compared to the same period in 2007, but very few have
been approved. What will happen if we do not accept
these asylum applications as a humanitarian gesture?
What will happen if we do?
The rising number of
asylum seekers from Mexican law enforcement and the
professional classes is a new phenomenon, not merely
another facet of our open borders fiasco. These people
are not
swimming the Rio Grande or sneaking across the
Sonora desert. They are walking into our border ports of
entry from Texas to California and asking for
protection. We must respect them for following our laws
and doing it the right way. But we must also ask some
hard questions before throwing open our gates.
Humanitarian concerns must be balanced against other
considerations—because the
fate of Mexico hangs in that balance.
What happens to Mexico
if all the good cops flee to the U.S. or Europe and the
only ones left are working hand-in-glove with the
criminals? What are the consequences if all the honest
judges and prosecutors flee and only dishonest ones are
left in charge of the courts? What happens if honest
businessmen find it easy to flee to
San Diego, Houston or
Phoenix and only those who will do the cartels'
money laundering are running the nation's trucking
companies, farms, and banks?
The unpleasant truth is
that this new refugee problem is the sign of a deep
crisis not in the Mexican economy but in the Mexican
political system itself. Mexico exhibits mounting signs
of a "failed state," a political system that
cannot satisfy the most
basic conditions of civic order such as safety in
one’s streets, home, school and workplace. Failing
states begin to hemorrhage people and their assets. The
middle class begins to flee—doctors, lawyers,
accountants, business owners, teachers, and of course,
law enforcement officials, who are the first targets of
criminal organizations.
These new "civic
disorder refugees" are not like the millions of
unemployed or underemployed who leave Mexico to a
find a job and a better life. These middle class
citizens have jobs—often good jobs by Mexican
standards—but they do not have security for themselves
or their families. They would much prefer to stay in
Mexico but they cannot do so safely, so they flee.
If police chiefs and
judges cannot be protected from the cartels, then how
can ordinary citizens feel safe? If we open the gates to
everyone who has a
"credible fear" of the cartels, the
Border Patrol will no longer have to worry only
about
people jumping the fence. Thousands will be waiting
in line at one of over 300 ports of entry.
This new "emigration
from fear" poses an urgent challenge for Mexico. If
Mexico wants to win its battle against the drug cartels,
it must begin by reforming its police and criminal
justice systems so that honest cops, judges and
mayors—and journalists—can do their jobs without undue
fear of retaliation. To his credit, President Calderon
has begun to tackle this problem.
Military operations
against the cartel strongholds are probably necessary,
but they can never be a substitute for a functioning
criminal justice system. Mexican citizens must be able
to trust the local police, and local police must be able
to trust their government to protect them from
gangster-terrorists.
The United States must
not become an
automatic escape valve for honest officials
threatened by cartel violence. If that happens, Mexico
will lose its most valued civil servants and become
increasingly a
militarized (and
polarized) society.
Mexico is not yet a
failed state, but if humanitarian sentiment and special
interest pleadings in the U.S. block sound immigration
policy—as happens
all too often in American law and politics—we will
hasten that tragic development.